Позиційні вимоги Великої Палати ВС щодо права вкладників вимагати від банку 3 % пені породила неоднозначність у судовій практиці
Dmytro Duginov
Attorney at Law
Crimean Deposits
Рада з питань захисту прав споживачів фінпослуг звернулася до ВП ВС щодо застосування законодавства про пеню за вкладами.
Penalty on deposits depends on the time for which the debtor is overdue, so the termination of the contract by the court does not presuppose the absence of grounds for its application
The period for calculating interest is limited to the moment when the court decision on termination of the deposit agreement comes into force.
Court awarded the depositor with the fine stipulated by the Law of Ukraine on Consumer Protection. This fine was several times the amount of original deposit. The court decision has been executed.
В інтересах клієнта вдалося відсудити додаткову пеню в сумі 4 200 000 грн. Рішення суду виконано
The fine was increased from UAH 900 000 up to UAH 6 200 000 during the time when the court decision has not been executed
The depositor was granted with deposits, deposit interests and penalties including the fine stipulated by the Law of Ukraine on Consumer Protection. The court’s decision has been executed.
На этой странице представлены материалы, касающиеся работы адвоката Дмитрия Дугинова по делам крымских вкладчиков ПриватБанка с 2014 года.